The Electoral Commission has filed an appeal to challenge the High Court
ruling asking it to allow the Progressive People’s Party (PPP) to
correct their nomination form errors that accounted for the
disqualification of the party's candidate from the presidential race.
The election management body is invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in their appeal.
An
Accra High Court last week directed the EC of Ghana to make way for Dr
Paa Kwesi Nduom to correct anomalies cited on his nomination form.
The
court presided over by His Lordship Kyei Baffuor, said the EC breached
the law of natural justice in disqualifying the PPP flagbearer from the
race, and, therefore, asked the election management body to allow him to
make the necessary corrections on his nomination forms.
Dr Nduom, according to the EC, was disqualified because “the number of subscribers to his forms did not meet the requirements of Regulation 7 (2) (b) of CI 94".
The
PPP then filed a lawsuit seeking to restrain the EC from proceeding
with the balloting for positions of presidential candidates.
But
on Friday, October 28th, the presiding judge sitting at the Commercial
Court 7, made it clear that the EC should have given Dr Nduom an
opportunity to correct anomalies on his nomination form before
disqualifying him.
"I will proceed after quashing the
decision of the Respondents disqualifying the Applicant as a candidate
and order that the Respondents afford opportunity to the Applicant to
make the necessary alteration or amendment to its nomination paper for
it to receive same and then proceed to determine whether the Applicant
had met all the criteria laid down by the laws of the Republic, in line
with its duty laid down by C.I. 94. EC has no basis to complain that
nomination period has closed when they did not set one. They only set
nomination day under regulation 7 but not nomination period under
regulation 9(2) as I have already found. The time frame to afford the
Applicant is entirely within the discretion of the Respondents being
mindful of the limited time available for the elections on December 7,
2016," Justice Eric K. Baffour, Esq ruled.
However, barely a
week after the landmark ruling, the EC says it is heeding to the
Supreme Court for clarity and possible quashing of the ruling.
In a statement issued today and copied Peacefmonline.com, the EC indicated that "having
carefully studied the contents of the judgment, we respectfully
disagree with the High Court judge’s decision on several essential legal
and public policy grounds".
Read EC's statement below....
REVIEW OF HIGH COURT DECISION
The
Electoral Commission has completed a review of the judgment of the High
Court, Accra dated 28th October, 2016 in the case of the Republic v Mrs. Charlotte Osei & Electoral Commission; Ex parte Dr. Papa Kwesi Nduom, numbered GT1401/2016.
Having carefully studied the contents of the judgment, we respectfully disagree with the High Court judge’s decision on several essential legal and public policy grounds.
The
Commission is of the firm conviction backed by the law, that candidates
seeking the highest office of the land, must take full responsibility
for ensuring that their nomination forms meet the standard in form and
substance, required by the law.
The Commission is further of the
view that falsified signatures on nomination forms constitute a matter
for criminal investigation and are not mere anomalies or clerical
errors, which should be pointed out to candidates for corrections to be
effected.
The Commision believes that, as in other
jurisdictions, presidential candidates must ensure the accuracy of the
information on documents which they present under oath to public
institutions. Failure to place this burden on the shoulders of the
candidates, has serious implications for our democratic growth and
electoral justice.
In the interest of public policy and the
credibility of the electoral process, the Commission has today filed an
application at the Supreme Court to quash the High Court decision and
seek clarity on the relevant aspects of the law on candidate
nominations.
We believe it is in the overall national interest
and on the grounds of public policy that the Supreme Court provides
clarity on this matter. A judgment from the Apex Court would effectively
bring finality to the issue once and for all.
In the interest
of national peace and cohesion, we respectfully implore the Highest
Court of the land to determine our application expeditiously in
accordance with the earlier directive of Her Ladyship the Chief Justice
and for the sake of the electoral calendar.
Thank you.
Signed:
ERIC KOFI DZAKPASU
Head of Communications
Email: mediaoffice@ec.gov.gh
No comments:
Post a Comment